-
Fireside Chat
Thierry Carrez
-
CheckInOct. 24
-
WelcomeMatthias TinnemeierOct. 24
-
Keynote - Effective Control: Going Beyond Digital Sovereignty
Thierry CarrezOct. 24
-
How to Build a Central Storage Platform for Research and Administration Today?
Andreas NiederländerOct. 24
-
Predicting GitOps at 15,000+ Clusters: What Large-Scale Testing Taught Us
Artem LajkoOct. 24
-
Building a Scalable Alternative to Hyperscale Clouds
Christoph StreitOct. 24
-
Benchmark vs Test – OpenStack Rally in Practice
Michel RaabeOct. 24
-
Automatic Eviction and Migration of VMs in OpenStack Clusters Running on k8s
Stefan HoffmannOct. 24
-
OpenStack backup aligned: multitenancy, data and metadata
Artur WojcikOct. 24
Gerd Prüßmann is a cloud technology leader with nearly two decades of experience in enterprise cloud, AI, and open-source infrastructure. Currently VP Cloud Solutions at Cloudflight, he has held senior roles at Deutsche Telekom, T-Systems, and Mirantis, and served as CTO at Cloud Ace and wenovate.
A long-standing voice in the OpenInfra and OpenStack community, Gerd is a frequent international speaker. At the OpenInfra Summit Paris 2025 he presented "Breaking Free from Cloud Vendor Lock-in," making the case for digital sovereignty through open, portable, container-based hybrid cloud architectures—helping European enterprises reduce hyperscaler dependency and regain control of their technology, data, and strategic autonomy.
The default answer to "where do we run our AI workloads" is a US hyperscaler — a quiet decision to hand the most strategic layer of your future business systems to a vendor whose roadmap, pricing, and jurisdiction you don't control. This talk presents a working blueprint for an alternative: an agent-serving platform built for AI resilience, where the choice of model, provider, and location is a configuration value rather than an architectural commitment.
At the heart of the platform is an AI gateway that unifies inference across every model — frontier, open-weight, or self-hosted — behind one interface, with routing, model swap by config, cost tracking, observability, and a built-in chat front-end. Around it sit the vector store, state and caching, a fine-tuning loop, and the full monitoring stack — all defined as code and provisioned automatically across cloud providers. The result: swapping a model or moving inference between providers becomes a configuration change rather than a rebuild — the dial that makes the platform sovereign, resilient, and trusted by design.
I'll show how it runs deployed across two independent cloud providers in a resilient configuration, where no single provider, model vendor, or jurisdiction is a point of failure. The gateway also doubles as an evaluation harness — letting you audition open models against a frontier baseline through the real workload before committing any infrastructure, so trust in a model is measured rather than assumed. I'll touch on the practical realities of running open models on your own GPUs, but keep the focus on the architecture that makes the choice reversible rather than the hardware underneath it.
The argument is not anti-hyperscaler. It's that the binary framing — managed or self-hosted, pick one — is the wrong way to decide. The platform that lets you change your mind cheaply, across providers and jurisdictions, is the one worth building. Especially for European organizations with regulated data and a real interest in not exporting it, that combination of sovereignty, resilience, and trust is worth more than the marginal convenience of a managed endpoint.